Venus-Saturn conjunctions

You can see space but you can’t see time – “Time is an ice that instantly sublimes.”  You can see time only by translating it into space: into graphs, in which it is one of the dimensions.  You can see, from –

– our Zodiac Wavy Charts, in which one of the dimensions is months and the other is the zodiac, that 2020 is less than a month away, and that the Sun is dipping deepest south in its journey through the provinces of the zodiac.  And will in January begin feeling its way back north.

(See the end note about enlarging illustrations.)

In the December band of the chart, you can see the First Quarter Moon of the middle of Wednesday December 4, and Venus speeding ahead of the Sun into the evening sky and overtaking Saturn on December 11.

Here is a map of the part of the sky in which the Venus-Saturn encounter takes place.

Saturn’s path is shown for the whole of 2019; Venus’s, for part of February and part of December.  The paths are gray when the planets are in the morning sky, and black in the evening sky, as they are now.

In a year, Saturn travels only about 1/30 of the way around the sky; Venus goes roughly all around the sky, because it stays roughly near the Sun.  So this year Venus passes Saturn in both February and December.

Why are there three connecting lines at each of the dates?

The red line is perpendicular to the celestial equator (which is horizontal and off the top of this map).  It connects the planets at the moment of conjunction in right ascension: that is, the moment when one is exactly north of the other.  This is the kind of conjunction often given in almanacs, because it suits the view in equatorially-mounted telescopes.

The green line is perpendicular to the ecliptic.  It connects the planets at the moment when one passes the other in ecliptic longitude.

The black line connects them at the moment of their appulse: when the angular distance between them is shortest.

In the present case, the three moments fall only a few hours apart.     But they can be up to several days apart, if the two bodies are quite far apart, or if one of them is on a strongly curving part of its path.

I confess that I’ve lost at least four days trying to get the programming of these geometries sorted out.  I was working on it because it’s very interesting for Venus.  I think I’ll show one of my diagrams, for another kind of Venus conjunction.

We’ll show a sky view nearer to the 11th.

 

__________

ILLUSTRATIONS in these posts are made with precision but have to be inserted in another format.  You may be able to enlarge them on your monitor.  One way: right-click, and choose “View image”, then enlarge.  Or choose “Copy image”, then put it on your desktop, then open it.  On an iPad or phone, use the finger gesture that enlarges (spreading with two fingers, or tapping and dragging with three fingers).  Other methods have been suggested, such as dragging the image to the desktop and opening it in other ways.

This weblog maintains its right to be about astronomy or anything under the sun.

 

9 thoughts on “Venus-Saturn conjunctions”

  1. Guy, thank you for the excellent post. Your graphics are excellent as usual, but if it’s not too difficult, I wondered if one more graphic could help illustrate an interesting aspect of your map of the sky showing Venus passing Saturn. What is interesting is that in February 2019, our sightline showed Venus above the ecliptic by about 2 degrees, while in December 2019, against the exact same stars, our sightline shows Venus 2 degrees below the ecliptic. So, somewhere in Venus’ orbit between those two points, it must have gone through descending node? We are in a different position in our orbit, by more than 2/12 of the way around, so I assume Venus is in a significantly different place in its orbit as well, is that right?
    I managed to image the two planets yesterday evening near my home in central Virginia:
    http://www.starvergnuegen.com/astropix/2019_12/nef_21_1a.jpg

  2. Isn’t the theory that time began with the big bang based on the idea that a singularity would have no motion relative to any other mass, therefore no time?

    1. Mike. I thought of commenting on your comment, and will do so now. It was acute. It’s neat opposite to my proposition.
      This is the quatrain from which my quotation came:
      The visual mind embraces space and letters,
      Is numbed by numbers, paralysed by time.
      Space can be touched, owned, walked, has bulk and texture,
      Time is an ice that instantly sublimes.

    1. I think of time as synonymous with motion. If all motion could be stopped down to the subatomic level, would not all time stop as well? I realize this is not possible, Heisenberg comes to mind, but still, a curious thought.

Write a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.